Originally Posted by savva0122
He's probably done just enough, but it's not the Harmison of 2004. The wickets have suited him on the whole, and although he is the man in possession, I agree a couple of poor performances are probably all he needs to be derailed for a while.
Now that I entirely agree with and if he's dropped again for not performing, I wouldn't consider a further recall. As it is, I felt recalling him at the Oval was marginal, given that he's done well before in county cricket and then bowled like a drain in tests.