Originally Posted by 1000yardstare
He might stay in the side with others getting injured.
Now it seems that Starc will be out for a while. Siddle only had a poor year in 2014.
It will also help him if he got the new ball instead of first change.
I did mention the fast bowling plague. I rate the guy and without the recent retirees, he's certainly a good choice in terms of experience and consistency. He's also only 31 so hardly ancient. It's just a lot more cricket likely to be needed to get that further 100 wickets. They don't play as many as England in a year, do they?