Originally Posted by Aidan11
I don't think I've ever seen a poll shoot so far up in one direction.
Probably because with a fairly obvious conclusion most of the time you wouldn't bother with one.
In a game where there were lots of runs, few bowlers stood out and he made the biggest and quickfire double, it's a no brainer.
I was tempted to play devil's advocate and vote "anyone else" with Amla and others who still had to make their runs under more pressure than Stokes was under bearing in mind England weren't 600 runs behind when they were batting...........
Maybe I should change my vote
, that is a valid point