Cricket 24/7  

Welcome to the Cricket 24/7.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. There are also more forums available to members, such as the Lounge - where members chat about just about anything under the sun except cricket!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   Cricket 24/7 > Cricket Discussion Forums > International Cricket
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar Casino Articles Terms of Use Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2nd July 2007, 19:20   #181
Aidan11
Harmisonesque
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Somewhere cold and wet
Posts: 39,323
You know what I mean
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northantsfanone View Post
Speaking to Geoff Cook today they may released Mark Wood from Durham. He rates him but the kid has had an operation and maybe one too many bowlers on the books type deal.
Aidan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2007, 23:30   #182
Michelle Fivefer
Posting Goddess
 
Michelle Fivefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North West England
Team(s): England, Lancashire
Posts: 41,625
Let's hope no new rankings appear until after the next game.
Michelle Fivefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th July 2007, 10:50   #183
savva0122
County 1st Team
 
savva0122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Burton-on-Trent, Staffs
Team(s): Derbyshire CCC, England
Age: 44
Posts: 340
Send a message via AIM to savva0122
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastBowlersUnion View Post
Batting (still waiting to make it into the top 100)

133 (-2) - Plunkett
214 (?) - Shah
219 (+27) - Cook
256 (+2) - Panesar
258 (-1) - Anderson
302 (-8) - Broad
319 (-10) - Yardy

Bowling
124 (-1) - Yardy
132 (+44) - Broad
199 (-2) - Pietersen
200 (-2) - Bell
262 (?) - Mascarenhas
Yardy's about right there, in both batting and bowling. How in God's name could anyone pick the useless munter?

Moore's first really big f*** up
savva0122 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 23:43   #184
1000yardstare
Posting Goddess
 
1000yardstare's Avatar
JA 774 Wagner 118 TCurran 5 SCurran 0 Cummins 85
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 20,014
ICC Cricket ODI Rankings 7 July 2007

Batting

2 (-1) - Pietersen
27 (-) - Collingwood
28 (-4) - Bell
33 (-1) - Trescothick
34 (+1) - Flintoff
36 (-) - Strauss
67 (-3) - Vaughan
78 (-1) - Jones
82 (-1) - Solanki
96 (-3) - Joyce

Bowling

15 (-1) - Flintoff
31 (-3) - Anderson
53 (+4) - Plunkett
58 (-3) - Gough
63 (-) - Lewis
69 (-7) - Collingwood
74 (-4) - Mahmood
86 (-) - Panesar
97 (-1) - Dalrymple

Yet to get into the top 100

Batting
131 (+2) - Plunkett
149 (?) - Prior
163 (+51) - Shah
190 (+29) - Cook
250 (+6) - Panesar
258 (-) - Anderson
283 (+19) - Broad
310 (-9) - Yardy
357 (?) - Mascarenhas

Bowling
124 (-7) - Yardy
128 (+4) - Broad
189 (+73) - Mascarenhas
201 (-3) - Pietersen
202 (-2) - Bell

Last edited by 1000yardstare : 8th July 2007 at 00:03.
1000yardstare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2007, 01:15   #185
Michelle Fivefer
Posting Goddess
 
Michelle Fivefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North West England
Team(s): England, Lancashire
Posts: 41,625
So KP falls off his pedestal. But only by 1 place. For everyone else it looks like back to square one.
Michelle Fivefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2007, 08:54   #186
daz
Posting God
 
daz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Team(s): Northamptonshire
Posts: 11,288
Its good too see Flintoff moving up in the Batting list.
__________________
Look out for my flag in Dhaka.
daz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2007, 09:18   #187
Rey
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Castleford
Team(s): Yorkshire
Posts: 14,309
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastBowlersUnion View Post
189 (+73) - Mascarenhas
Presumably this was done on economy, rather than wickets?
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastBowlersUnion View Post
250 (+6) - Panesar
258 (-) - Anderson
Go MONTY!
__________________
"He has sat on the fence so long that the iron has entered his soul."
Rey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2007, 22:08   #188
Fatslogger
Self Confessed Mentalist
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hitchin
Team(s): England and Liverpool
Age: 41
Posts: 43,265
The England Forum is a depressing place at the moment isn't it? I suppose we ought not to take the ODIs too seriously, for fear of suicide if nothing else.
__________________
Work is the curse of the drinking classes - Wilde
Fatslogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2007, 09:20   #189
Aidan11
Harmisonesque
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Somewhere cold and wet
Posts: 39,323
KP only no.2? He's rubbish he is.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northantsfanone View Post
Speaking to Geoff Cook today they may released Mark Wood from Durham. He rates him but the kid has had an operation and maybe one too many bowlers on the books type deal.
Aidan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2007, 09:36   #190
slop
Posting God
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge
Team(s): South Africa
Age: 41
Posts: 18,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan11 View Post
KP only no.2? He's rubbish he is.
No. 2 seems somehow an appropriate designation for him though
slop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2007, 21:03   #191
1000yardstare
Posting Goddess
 
1000yardstare's Avatar
JA 774 Wagner 118 TCurran 5 SCurran 0 Cummins 85
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 20,014
Goodbye to the ODIs.

ICC Cricket Test Rankings as at 3 July 2007

Batsmen

4 (-1) - Pietersen
14 (-1) - Collingwood
20 (-) - Cook
21 (-) - Bell
22 (-) - Strauss
24 (-) - Trescothick
29 (+1) - Flintoff
Was 38 - Vaughan (not on the rankings at present)
67 (-) - Prior
80 (+2 - Jones
84 (+3) - Giles
98 (+1) - Shah

Bowlers

6 (-) - Panesar
6 (-) - Hoggard
11 (-) - Flintoff
21 (-) - Harmison
38 (-) - Giles
Was 42 - Sidebottom (not on the rankings at present)
51 (+1) - Anderson
59 (+1) - Plunkett
60 +2) - Mahmood
73 (+2) - Udal
86 (+1) - Lewis
100 (NEW) - Collingwood
1000yardstare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2007, 17:39   #192
zxb
Posting God
 
zxb's Avatar
Just biding my time...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Team(s): England and the Bangas
Age: 34
Posts: 12,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by FastBowlersUnion View Post
Goodbye to the ODIs.

ICC Cricket Test Rankings as at 3 July 2007

Batsmen

4 (-1) - Pietersen
14 (-1) - Collingwood
20 (-) - Cook
21 (-) - Bell
22 (-) - Strauss
24 (-) - Trescothick
29 (+1) - Flintoff
Was 38 - Vaughan (not on the rankings at present)
67 (-) - Prior
80 (+2 - Jones
84 (+3) - Giles
98 (+1) - Shah
Says something if pretty much the only batsmen increasing their ratings are the ones not playing doesn't it.
__________________
"Only the dead have seen the end of war" - Plato

"What counts is not necessarily the size of the dog in the fight - it's the size of the fight in the dog." - Eisenhower

"The Pie will soon be mine" - Weebl
zxb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2007, 20:28   #193
Fatslogger
Self Confessed Mentalist
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hitchin
Team(s): England and Liverpool
Age: 41
Posts: 43,265
Quote:
Originally Posted by zxb View Post
Says something if pretty much the only batsmen increasing their ratings are the ones not playing doesn't it.
Well you wouldn't expect any of them to move very much due to tests being played between other sides but the batsmen lower down the rankings are more prone to fluctuation by a place or two, I suppose.
__________________
Work is the curse of the drinking classes - Wilde
Fatslogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 21:03   #194
1000yardstare
Posting Goddess
 
1000yardstare's Avatar
JA 774 Wagner 118 TCurran 5 SCurran 0 Cummins 85
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 20,014
ICC Cricket Test Rankings after 1st Test v India

Batsmen

4 (-) - Pietersen
16 (-2) - Collingwood
20 (+2) - Strauss
21 (-1) - Cook
22 (-1) - Bell
24 (-) - Trescothick
31 (+7) - Vaughan
32 (-3) - Flintoff
68 (-1) - Prior
82 (-2) - Jones
87 (-3) - Giles
100 (-2) - Shah

Bowlers

7 (-1) - Hoggard
9 (-3) - Panesar
11 (-) - Flintoff
23 (-2) - Harmison
35 (+7) - Sidebottom
39 (-1) - Giles
42 (+9) - Anderson
60 (-1) - Plunkett
62 (-2) - Mahmood
76 (-3) - Udal
77 NEW- Tremlett
91 (-5) - Lewis
94 NEW - Vaughan
1000yardstare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 21:08   #195
daz
Posting God
 
daz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Team(s): Northamptonshire
Posts: 11,288
Sharp drop for Monty
__________________
Look out for my flag in Dhaka.
daz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 22:21   #196
Minor Maggie
Buttleresque
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Leeds
Team(s): Lancashire, England
Posts: 26,633
How does Vaughan get a ranking for the first time! Glad to see JA going up. He should be aiming to get into the top 20 in the near future.
Minor Maggie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 22:24   #197
zxb
Posting God
 
zxb's Avatar
Just biding my time...
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Team(s): England and the Bangas
Age: 34
Posts: 12,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minor Maggie View Post
How does Vaughan get a ranking for the first time!
Because he's a damn fine allrounder of course.

KP still 4th.
__________________
"Only the dead have seen the end of war" - Plato

"What counts is not necessarily the size of the dog in the fight - it's the size of the fight in the dog." - Eisenhower

"The Pie will soon be mine" - Weebl
zxb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd July 2007, 22:36   #198
1000yardstare
Posting Goddess
 
1000yardstare's Avatar
JA 774 Wagner 118 TCurran 5 SCurran 0 Cummins 85
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 20,014
Vaughan was always languishing in the 40's until the beginning of this year when he vanished from the rankings for 6 months, probably because he had not played for a while. If a player starts playing again I would guess he gets his last ranking back.

I think players are kept in the rankings for 18 months without playing then disappear. Simon Jones has gone.
1000yardstare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2007, 20:38   #199
1000yardstare
Posting Goddess
 
1000yardstare's Avatar
JA 774 Wagner 118 TCurran 5 SCurran 0 Cummins 85
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London
Posts: 20,014
ICC Cricket Test Rankings after 2nd Test v India

Batsmen

4 (-) - Pietersen
14 (+2) - Collingwood
20 (+1) - Cook
21 (-1) - Strauss
22 (-) - Bell
24 (+7) - Vaughan
26 (-2) - Trescothick
33 (-1) - Flintoff
75 (-7) - Prior
83 (-1) - Jones
87 (-) - Giles

Bowlers

6 (+3) - Panesar
9 (-2) - Hoggard
14 (-3) - Flintoff
25 (-2) - Harmison
38 (+1) - Giles
42 (-7) - Sidebottom
44 (-2) - Anderson
47 (+30) - Tremlett
61 (-1) - Plunkett
63 (-1) - Mahmood
77 (-1) - Udal
91 (-) - Lewis
94 (-) - Vaughan
1000yardstare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2007, 20:50   #200
Michelle Fivefer
Posting Goddess
 
Michelle Fivefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North West England
Team(s): England, Lancashire
Posts: 41,625
You can see that the ratings only look at the scorecard (as previously discussed) otherwise Sidebottom would surely not have dropped 7 places. Harmison moving down a bit and Tremlett moving up - sign of things to come? The batsmen still roughly as before but Vaughan is rapidly regaining ground.

I know it's because of other moves but it seems odd for Giles to be moving up!
Michelle Fivefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:04.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Cricket247.org