Cricket 24/7  

Welcome to the Cricket 24/7.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. There are also more forums available to members, such as the Lounge - where members chat about just about anything under the sun except cricket!

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   Cricket 24/7 > Cricket Discussion Forums > International Cricket
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar Casino Articles Terms of Use Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1st January 2016, 20:56   #1
Rey
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Castleford
Team(s): Yorkshire
Posts: 14,305
South Africa v England 2nd Test, Cape Town Jan 2-6

The 2nd Test starts tomorrow morning, at the slightly later time of 8.30am. Only two days is an incredibly short turnaround between Tests, all the worse for the South Africans after what was a big loss. A lot has been talked about their excellent record at Newlands, but this is not a confident team, whilst England's star is on the rise.

England (probable) 1 Alastair Cook (capt), 2 Alex Hales, 3 Nick Compton, 4 Joe Root, 5 James Taylor, 6 Ben Stokes, 7 Jonny Bairstow (wk), 8 Moeen Ali, 9 Stuart Broad, 10 Steven Finn, 11 James Anderson/Chris Woakes

South Africa (probable) 1 Stiaan van Zyl, 2 Dean Elgar, 3 Hashim Amla, 4 AB de Villiers, 5 Faf du Plessis, 6 Temba Bavuma, 7 Quinton de Kock (wk), 8 Kyle Abbott/Chris Morris, 9 Dane Piedt, 10 Morne Morkel, 11 Kagiso Rabada
__________________
"He has sat on the fence so long that the iron has entered his soul."
Rey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 21:20   #2
Goochies Lovechild
Club Cricketer
 
Goochies Lovechild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Essex
Age: 74
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rey View Post
The 2nd Test starts tomorrow morning, at the slightly later time of 8.30am. Only two days is an incredibly short turnaround between Tests, all the worse for the South Africans after what was a big loss. A lot has been talked about their excellent record at Newlands, but this is not a confident team, whilst England's star is on the rise.

England (probable) 1 Alastair Cook (capt), 2 Alex Hales, 3 Nick Compton, 4 Joe Root, 5 James Taylor, 6 Ben Stokes, 7 Jonny Bairstow (wk), 8 Moeen Ali, 9 Stuart Broad, 10 Steven Finn, 11 James Anderson/Chris Woakes

South Africa (probable) 1 Stiaan van Zyl, 2 Dean Elgar, 3 Hashim Amla, 4 AB de Villiers, 5 Faf du Plessis, 6 Temba Bavuma, 7 Quinton de Kock (wk), 8 Kyle Abbott/Chris Morris, 9 Dane Piedt, 10 Morne Morkel, 11 Kagiso Rabada
I would probably have Dumbum in ahead of Bavuma who looked all at sea in the first test

I would also have Q de Q opening and VZ at 7
__________________
GL

Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!

The statement below is true.
The statement above is false
Goochies Lovechild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 21:24   #3
Goochies Lovechild
Club Cricketer
 
Goochies Lovechild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Essex
Age: 74
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goochies Lovechild View Post
I would probably have Dumbum in ahead of Bavuma who looked all at sea in the first test
I would also like Compo opening Taylor 3 and Hales at 7...I dont feel good with him opening but I think he deserves a run in the side without being subjected this early in his career to the international new ball
__________________
GL

Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!

The statement below is true.
The statement above is false
Goochies Lovechild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 22:46   #4
Michelle Fivefer
Posting Goddess
 
Michelle Fivefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North West England
Team(s): England, Lancashire
Posts: 41,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goochies Lovechild View Post
I would also like Compo opening Taylor 3 and Hales at 7...I dont feel good with him opening but I think he deserves a run in the side without being subjected this early in his career to the international new ball
If Hales doesn't open there's no reason to pick him at all. It's only the inability to find a decent partner for Cook that brought Hales into the frame at all.
__________________
As balanced and focused as the next man
Michelle Fivefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 23:06   #5
Goochies Lovechild
Club Cricketer
 
Goochies Lovechild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Essex
Age: 74
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelle Fivefer View Post
If Hales doesn't open there's no reason to pick him at all. It's only the inability to find a decent partner for Cook that brought Hales into the frame at all.
I agree but he HAS been selected so he deserves a chance

I doubt even his mother thinks he will come straight in to open for england

Unless i am misken Warner did not initially open for the Aussies

Running behind the times again - Continual knee jerk reactions are not going to fix the problem

Who would you have open in Hales ' absence ?
__________________
GL

Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!

The statement below is true.
The statement above is false
Goochies Lovechild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 23:14   #6
Michelle Fivefer
Posting Goddess
 
Michelle Fivefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North West England
Team(s): England, Lancashire
Posts: 41,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goochies Lovechild View Post
I agree but he HAS been selected so he deserves a chance

I doubt even his mother thinks he will come straight in to open for england

Unless i am misken Warner did not initially open for the Aussies

Running behind the times again - Continual knee jerk reactions are not going to fix the problem

Who would you have open in Hales ' absence ?
Well yes, he does deserve a chance, and I have said so elsewhere, although if left to me I'd never have picked him in the first place. His ODI record is still mediocre despite that recent century. But you are advocating moving him down the order. He was picked to open after some success opening for Notts last season and now he's in the team he must be given the series.

I would never have dropped Compton in 2013. Could have saved two and a bit years of futile faffing about. If they felt the need to leave him out after his dismal home NZ series they could have given him another chance in the Ashes. So far it seems he performs better overseas.
__________________
As balanced and focused as the next man
Michelle Fivefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 21:47   #7
blackeyedangles
County 2nd Team
 
blackeyedangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 209
Unless this test sees a sparkling return to form of an SA middle-order batsman like Faf or Amla, I can't see how they can win it. England's seam and even spin look stronger with no Steyn, they bat deeper and they've got more players in form...

Just for fun, some absolutely baseless predictions:

Debut test hundred for Taylor
Five-fors for Finn and Piedt, the latter far more expensive
Hales to make 30 and next to nothing again
Cook and Root and Amla and Faf all to fail again
At least two run-outs in the match

I'll gloat ridiculously if any of these happen
blackeyedangles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 22:02   #8
Goochies Lovechild
Club Cricketer
 
Goochies Lovechild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Essex
Age: 74
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackeyedangles View Post
Unless this test sees a sparkling return to form of an SA middle-order batsman like Faf or Amla, I can't see how they can win it. England's seam and even spin look stronger with no Steyn, they bat deeper and they've got more players in form...

Just for fun, some absolutely baseless predictions:

Debut test hundred for Taylor
Five-fors for Finn and Piedt, the latter far more expensive
Hales to make 30 and next to nothing again
Cook and Root and Amla and Faf all to fail again
At least two run-outs in the match

I'll gloat ridiculously if any of these happen
lol....Faf and AB are a disaster in the running stakes
I like Finn - he can go about a bit but he takes wickets
Hales - Yes I agree
Taylor - I hope so
Cook and Root, dont forget Root averaged nearly 50 in the first test, un-noticed (especially by Botham lol) by most but Cookie is class and he will have his day
__________________
GL

Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!

The statement below is true.
The statement above is false
Goochies Lovechild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2016, 18:21   #9
blackeyedangles
County 2nd Team
 
blackeyedangles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackeyedangles View Post
Unless this test sees a sparkling return to form of an SA middle-order batsman like Faf or Amla, I can't see how they can win it. England's seam and even spin look stronger with no Steyn, they bat deeper and they've got more players in form...

Just for fun, some absolutely baseless predictions:

Debut test hundred for Taylor
Five-fors for Finn and Piedt, the latter far more expensive
Hales to make 30 and next to nothing again
Cook and Root and Amla and Faf all to fail again
At least two run-outs in the match

I'll gloat ridiculously if any of these happen
Okay, so Taylor has royally screwed me by getting a golden duck... Always the second dig.

Piedt still has a chance!

Hales did well.

Root didn't fail and neither did Cook, really. Failure to convert, yes.

Bad day in the office for prognostications.
blackeyedangles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 22:02   #10
Psyduck
Posting God
 
Psyduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manchester
Team(s): England, Lancashire, Man Utd
Posts: 15,187
Crushing victory for England in the first test, the South Africans haven't won in seven tests and appear in total disarray and a two day turnaround between tests. The tourists have all the momentum so the smart money will be on a home win at Fortress Newlands.
Psyduck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 22:06   #11
Goochies Lovechild
Club Cricketer
 
Goochies Lovechild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Essex
Age: 74
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Psyduck View Post
Crushing victory for England in the first test, the South Africans haven't won in seven tests and appear in total disarray and a two day turnaround between tests. The tourists have all the momentum so the smart money will be on a home win at Fortress Newlands.
I will take your money.....

Admitted England has issues with winning two tests in a row but without Steyn they are in serious trouble - I can only see a poor batting display losing this test
__________________
GL

Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!

The statement below is true.
The statement above is false
Goochies Lovechild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 22:40   #12
Michelle Fivefer
Posting Goddess
 
Michelle Fivefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North West England
Team(s): England, Lancashire
Posts: 41,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goochies Lovechild View Post
I will take your money.....

Admitted England has issues with winning two tests in a row but without Steyn they are in serious trouble - I can only see a poor batting display losing this test
Expect low scores from Compton after being damned with such faint praise by Bayliss. The man was a favourite for Man of the Match and practically all the pundits agree that he played very important knocks at Durban. Just the time then for the coach to come out and say he's 'ultimately' looking for a more attacking no.3. Personally I think a consistent opening partner for Cook is a more pressing need. Let's hope Hales manages to fulfil it. I thought the point of Hales was that he was going to be a more attacking foil for Cook's steadier pace?
__________________
As balanced and focused as the next man
Michelle Fivefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 23:02   #13
Goochies Lovechild
Club Cricketer
 
Goochies Lovechild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Essex
Age: 74
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelle Fivefer View Post
Expect low scores from Compton after being damned with such faint praise by Bayliss. The man was a favourite for Man of the Match and practically all the pundits agree that he played very important knocks at Durban.
Why expect low scores - He batted well at Durban - Typical hype to build somone up only to knock them down - I would have voted for him a MOM had Elgar not batted so well

What is peoples problem with Compton - Ok he is a Sud and went to school with Hashim but he has a solid defense in a Trott mode and is a great slip in at three against Bell who dragged his career out and really became embarasing at the end

Im not sure what pundits you are referring to but if its the sky lot then they should stick to keeping quiet and reading some of the written press opinions - Dont get me off on Botham....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelle Fivefer View Post
Just the time then for the coach to come out and say he's 'ultimately' looking for a more attacking no.3.
I have not heard this - Please link me to this comment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelle Fivefer View Post
I think a consistent opening partner for Cook is a more pressing need. Let's hope Hales manages to fulfil it. I thought the point of Hales was that he was going to be a more attacking foil for Cook's steadier pace?
I think you must have missed my post on Hales - Just in case it is below

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goochies Lovechild View Post
No - I take your point but unless he can get to Warner status he will not succeed

Dont get me wrong I would love him to be "our" Warner but I fear the pressure will make him revert into a style of player he is not...
__________________
GL

Before you judge a man, walk a mile in his shoes; after that, who cares?! He's a mile away and you've got his shoes!

The statement below is true.
The statement above is false
Goochies Lovechild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st January 2016, 23:30   #14
Michelle Fivefer
Posting Goddess
 
Michelle Fivefer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North West England
Team(s): England, Lancashire
Posts: 41,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goochies Lovechild View Post
Why expect low scores - He batted well at Durban - Typical hype to build somone up only to knock them down - I would have voted for him a MOM had Elgar not batted so well

What is peoples problem with Compton - Ok he is a Sud and went to school with Hashim but he has a solid defense in a Trott mode and is a great slip in at three against Bell who dragged his career out and really became embarasing at the end

Im not sure what pundits you are referring to but if its the sky lot then they should stick to keeping quiet and reading some of the written press opinions - Dont get me off on Botham....

I have not heard this - Please link me to this comment.
http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-af...ry/956991.html

I think you've misunderstood the tone of my post. I am a big Compton fan. Expecting low scores is a tongue in cheek comment given the faint praise given him by Trevor Bayliss. Perhaps faint praise is not the right expression, but in the interview he seems more interested in what is wrong with having Compton at #3 than what he can bring to the team. Remember, Bayliss is more of a one-day coach. He is very excited by the young England batsmen who have brought positive, aggressive batting into the game, particularly in the one-day formats. It isn't necessarily the right approach in test cricket though. But we have positive batsmen down the order. They don't all have to bat in the same way.

It was the pundits on both Sky and TMS who mostly agreed that Compton's approach paid off and was a big help to England. Once again I mustn't have made myself clear. It was disappointing that Bayliss has cast doubt on his suitability as a no. 3 after one match, and one match in which his method of batting was exactly what was required. It may not work another time, but that would be the time to mention it, not now.

I don't think fans have a problem with Compton at all. Not in the big wide fan world. It might just be on this board.
__________________
As balanced and focused as the next man
Michelle Fivefer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2016, 08:11   #15
Midnight
World Class
 
Midnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Melbourne
Team(s): Australia
Posts: 7,879
So England batting first on a very hot day. SA right up against it. The bowling looks weakened while the batting still problematic.

Kagiso Rabada is in for Steyn, Chris Morris for Abbott, and Quinton de Kock for JP Duminy, with AB de Villiers handing over the gloves.

Anderson is back!
Midnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2016, 08:21   #16
Chin Music
Administrator
 
Chin Music's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: la sala de opinion equivocada
Team(s): ****
Posts: 23,516
With Rabada and Morris coming in there is some greenness with this SA attack. Big onus on Morkel I think.
__________________
Quote:
"One of the greatest problems of our time is that many are schooled but few are educated" - Thomas More
Chin Music is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2016, 08:29   #17
Jock McTuffnel v3
World Class
 
Jock McTuffnel v3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cambridge
Team(s): England
Posts: 5,257
No scoring pressure now we have won the toss. Bat for 3 days please.


I note MPV has called out Moeen for only turning up when the team is on top - he's right.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cri...land-side.html
__________________
Jock McTuffnel v3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2016, 09:15   #18
Sir Virgs and Zamora
Posting God
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 18,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jock McTuffnel v3 View Post
No scoring pressure now we have won the toss. Bat for 3 days please.


I note MPV has called out Moeen for only turning up when the team is on top - he's right.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/cri...land-side.html
That is the beauty of being an all rounder like at brum in the ashes where he completely changed the course of the match.

Who was the last England spinner who did not do better with runs on the board?
Sir Virgs and Zamora is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2016, 08:46   #19
slop
Posting God
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridge
Team(s): South Africa
Age: 41
Posts: 18,805
Hmm, I guess the batting improves and less pressure on AB, but having Chris Morris is in is not a a good sign.
slop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd January 2016, 09:05   #20
Chin Music
Administrator
 
Chin Music's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: la sala de opinion equivocada
Team(s): ****
Posts: 23,516
Pretty good start so far from England. There doesn't seem to be many demons in the pitch and the ball has barely beaten the bat. Meanwhile as I type Hales has a flash outside off, but off a no ball.
__________________
Quote:
"One of the greatest problems of our time is that many are schooled but few are educated" - Thomas More
Chin Music is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:36.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Cricket247.org